Volume 5, Issue 2, p. 19-23, August 2022
Doi: https://doi.org/10.32435/envsmoke.20225219-23
Environmental Smoke, e-ISSN:
2595-5527
“Science, current events and
its challenges”
Full
Article:
A
2-YEAR FOLLOW UP ON PM2.5 EXPOSURE AND COVID-19 MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
Casey Mace Firebaugh1* (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-0022); Tishra Beeson1 (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7231-5816); Debra Rich1 (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-8791); Yasmin Vivana Barrios2; Amie
Wojtyna¹ (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-0747)
1Central Washington
University, Department of Health Sciences, Ellensburg, Washington, USA
2Yakima
Health District, Yakima, Washington, USA
*Corresponding Author: macec@cwu.edu
Submitted
on: 30 Jul. 2022
Accepted
on: 18 Aug. 2022
Published
on: 31 Aug. 2022
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Introduction: A previous study was conducted to examine
the relationship between poor air quality in the form of PM2.5 exposure and
COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in Yakima County, Washington (USA). Results
showed there was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between PM2.5 exposure
and COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality in the 12-day lag analysis, however
it was not clear if this association remains consistent over time. The purpose
of this study was to analyze a second year of PM2.5 exposure and COVID-19
morbidity and mortality in a population significantly impacted by poor air
quality (PM2.5) and high COVID-19 morbidity to determine whether the findings
of the previous study could be confirmed. Methods:
A 12-day lag analysis correlating PM2.5 levels and county-level COVID-19 case
counts, hospitalization, and mortality was conducted using Pearson correlation
between the period of February 1, 2021 and December
20, 2021 in Yakima, County, Washington, USA. Results:
PM2.5 was found to be significantly correlated (p<.011) to COVID-19
morbidity (r = 0.38), hospitalization (r = 0.41), and mortality (r = 0.18). Discussion:
This study expands upon and confirm previous preliminary findings examining the
association between poor air quality exposure and negative COVID-19 outcomes. Populations
exposed to long-term PM2.5 may need additional safeguards from COVID-19 as they
may have a higher risk of infection, hospitalization, and mortality.
Keywords:
PM 2.5. Air Quality. COVID-19.
1 Introduction
The emergence of
COVID-19 has presented a variety of public health challenges, not only due to
the nature of the disease and associated illnesses, but also due to the
exacerbation of previously existing public health issues. One such issue is
poor air quality exposure and the associated hospitalizations and deaths
related to particulate matter exposure in both the acute and long terms (WU et
al., 2020). Both COVID-19 and poor air quality exposure present risks to lung
and cardiovascular health and it is posited that there are several overlapping
health consequences to these two exposures (WU, et al, 2020; FIREBAUGH et al.,
2021). The present study aims to advance the literature on the correlation
between exposure to poor air quality in the form of particulate matter (PM 2.5)
to rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.
A previously conducted study by Firebaugh et al. provided a baseline
analysis that demonstrated the correlation of PM2.5 exposure to COVID-19
morbidity and mortality in Central Washington State (FIREBAUGH et al., 2021).
However, it is unclear if that association is consistent over time, as the
COVID-19 pandemic enters its third year. Therefore, the purpose of this
analysis is to determine if the correlation among these variables is still present
in the ongoing years since COVID-19 emerged.
Yakima, Washington is
an area characterized by persistent poor air quality as measured by 24-hour
period PM2.5 concentrations as well as the number of days in which levels of
PM2.5 levels reach unhealthy levels (FIREBAUGH, 2020; AMERICAN LUNG
ASSOCIATION, 2021). While several studies have demonstrated that there is a
connection between PM 2.5 or poor air quality exposure either at the global or
US National level, or urban environments, data regarding rural areas such as
Yakima, Washington are lacking (BOWE et. al., 2021; ZHOU et al., 2021;
TRAVAGLIO et al., 2021). Yakima, Washington is uniquely different than the
areas previously investigated in larger population-based studies. It is an area
that experiences geographic, environmental, and socioeconomic health
disparities (WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 2017). Yakima, Washington
is considered a rural county and has a different chemical composure of
particulate matter than urban areas, which are characterized by industrial
activities.
Summer
(June-September) in Yakima County is typically dry with average daily high
temperatures ranging from 78°F to 88°F. Climatological data from the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) indicates higher than average
temperatures (78°F to 96°F) were recorded June through September 2021,
including a June 29th record breaking high of 113°F followed by 27 days
>90°F with trace precipitation in July (NCEI, 2021). Air quality was
directly impacted in August and September by the 2021 Schneider Springs fire
which burned over 107,322 acres of timber and brush in Northwest Yakima County
according to InciWeb (2021). Yakima County recorded
PM2.5 Daily AQI values > 100 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) on 11 days and
AQI values >150 (unhealthy) on 15 days during the wildfire incident time
according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2022).
Yakima, Washington
experiences high levels of particulate matter due to seasonal forest fires,
farming activity, and wood-burning for heat (FIREBAUGH et al., 2022). Mendy et
al. (2021) found that areas with long-term exposures to high levels of PM2.5
were significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization rates, even when
controlling for socioeconomic status. The study asserted that areas with high
exposures to PM2.5 might need more stringent or increased efforts to control
exposure to COVID-19 in order to prevent the increased
risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality (MENDY et al., 2021).
It is important to
establish the association of PM2.5 exposure and COVID-19 morbidity and
mortality in unique geographically rural regions and populations such as
Yakima, Washington. One study conducted by Páez-Osuna,
Valencia-Castañeda and Rebolledo
(2021) aimed to examine the link between COVID-19 mortality and PM2.5 emissions
in rural and medium-size municipalities considering population density, dust
events, and wind speed. However, the study lacked access to PM2.5 monitors to
assess 24-hour PM2.5 levels, which limited the analysis. The present study aims
to reproduce and expand a previously conducted study that resulted in
preliminary findings.
2 Methods
A time-lag
correlation was conducted using the same methods of analysis previously
conducted year one study (FIREBAUGH et al., 2021). Descriptive and statistical
correlational analyses were performed on the publicly available data of 24-hour
daily average PM 2.5 counts and daily counts of COVID-19 hospitalizations,
cases, and mortality rates in Yakima County, Washington. As further research on
this topic has emerged, both 12 and 14-day lags appear to be the most
frequently used intervals of time between exposures and hospitalizations. The
present study performed a 12-day lag as was conducted in the previous study
that found significant correlations (FIREBAUGH et al., 2021).
Data Collection: COVID-19
daily and total
running confirmed cases and confirmed mortality rates were made publicly
available on the Washington State Department of
Health (USA) and Yakima
County Health District’s COVID-19 dashboard. Although the data were
publicly available, for both COVID-19 rates, hepatizations, and mortality and
the 24-hour PM2.5 levels in Yakima County, Washington, members of the County
Health District and regional representatives from the Washington State Department
of Ecology were consulted to obtain accurate counts for the respective measures
between the dates of February 1, 2021-December 20, 2021, which expanded the
date range from the previously conducted study for a total number of data
points (n=323). The Washington State
Department of Ecology Collects and Reports 24-hour daily average readings of
PM2.5 in Yakima County Washington (WASHINGTON SMOKE INFORMATION, 2020). The Washington State Department of Ecology
regularly calibrates the particle collectors to EPA standards and of the four
collectors stationed in the county, the one with the most reliable data
(defined as the least amount of missing daily counts) was used for this
analysis.
Data
Analysis: Descriptive data on the number of total daily cases of COVID-19,
daily hospitalizations and daily mortality rates in Yakima County, Washington were available. To
measure air quality, the 24-hour average PM2.5 measure from the validated particle
collectors were used as it is considered more reliable than a 24-hour max
reading. The range of PM2.5 readings, along with the number of unhealthy days
during this period of investigation were reported. Unhealthy days of air quality are defined
by the EPA
(2021) as having
a 24-hour average of PM2.5 ppm
concentration of 50 or over as leaving the healthy designation. A 12-day lag analysis using a Pearson
correlation was conducted between exposure (PM 2.5) and outcome (COVID-19 new
cases: days 1-12) to determine whether exposure
to PM2.5 was
significantly associated with new cases of COVID-19. This study had no research directly related
to human subjects, only publicly available data and was exempt from
institutional review board (IRB)/Human Subjects review at Central Washington
University.
3 Results
During the period of
observation, PM2.5 levels ranged from 1-102.9, with a mean of 10.8, (SD=11.4).
The number of days with concentrations over the EPA designated level of 50
PM2.5 ppm concentration of 50 or over was six days. The daily case counts of
COVID-19 ranged from 1-329, with an average of 66 cases per day (SD=61.8). The
daily hospitalization rate ranged from 0-14, with an average of 3.3, (SD=3.0).
The daily mortality rate from COVID-19 in Yakima County was less than 1 (.79,
SD=1.0) with a range of 0-5 deaths per day. In the Pearson correlation, PM2.5
was found to be significantly correlated (p<.011) to COVID-19 morbidity (r =
.38), hospitalization (r = 0.41), and mortality (r = 0.18) 12-day lag counts.
4 Discussion
This follow-up study demonstrated higher correlation coefficients for
all outcome variables (daily case counts, daily hospitalizations, and daily
mortality rates) in association with daily PM2.5 levels in Yakima, Washington,
than were found in the preliminary study. In fact, in the initial shorter-range
study, PM2.5 was not found to be significantly associated with daily mortality
rates, yet this follow-up analysis revealed a small, yet significant
association between daily PM2.5 levels and daily mortality rates.
A study conducted by Zhou et al., (2021) examined the excess of COVID-19
cases and deaths due to fine particulate matter exposure during the 2020
wildfires in the Western United States, which included Yakima County,
Washington. The study examined the 2020 wildfire season in a similar effort to
the previous study by Firebaugh et al., (2021), however, the Zhou study
included 92 counties on the West coast while the original Firebaugh et al.,
study only focused on Yakima County, Washington. In addition, the Zhou study
examined the fire season period from 15th of March to 16th of December 2020 and
the Firebaugh study March 1, 2020-October 15, 2020. The Yakima County only
study used data supplied by the Washington State Department of Ecology local
air quality monitors. The Zhou study focused on daily increases in PM2.5 levels
on wildfire days whereas the Firebaugh study focused on levels of daily levels
of PM2.5 regardless of source. However, the studies used different type of
analyses, the Firebaugh study used a simplified correlation analysis, and the
Zhou study employed a more complex multistep model factoring in covariates such
as temperature, humidity, etc. (FIREBAUGH et al., 2021). In the Zhou study, an
analysis of 10-point increases in PM2.5 levels in their measure of wildfire
days were not found to have a significant positive effect on COVID-19 outcomes
in Yakima County. It would be interesting to know if a follow-up study using
their methodology would yield repeated results if a second year follow up
analysis occurred.
A strength of this study is the confirmation of previous findings, by
expanding data points and duration of the original analysis. In addition, the
raw data was verified by the agencies issuing the publicly available data sets
for validity and guidance on use. However, the study was limited by the simple
methods of analysis performed. Due to the limited patient information
associated with case counts, confounding variables at the individual level
could not be controlled for in the analyses.
This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating the
dangers of acute and long-term poor air quality exposure in the era of COVID-19
infection and reinfection. Populations living in areas with persistent poor air
quality in the form of PM2.5 exposure should mitigate the risks of both PM2.5
and COVID-19 exposure to prevent the compounded impacts of these co-exposures.
This study has added a unique perspective, that of rural areas with
persistently poor air quality, which are distinct from urban air pollution
areas.
CREDIT AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT
C. Mace Firebaugh: Conceptualization,
Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing,
Proofreading, Validation, Y. Barios: Data curation,
Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing, Proofreading, Validation, T. Beeson:
Project administration, Writing, Proofreading, D. Rich: Writing, Proofreading,
A. Wojtyna: Proofreading.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
The authors disclose that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the
study reported in this manuscript.
FUNDING
SOURCE
This study
was funded by the American Lung Association COVID-19 and Emerging Respiratory
Viruses Research Award.
REFERENCES
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION (ALA). State of
the Air. American Lung Association, Chicago, 2021. Available from:
https://www.lung.org/getmedia/17c6cb6c-8a38-42a7-a3b0-6744011da370/sota-2021.pdf.
Accessed on: 21 may 2022
BOWE, B.; XIE, Y.; GIBSON, A.K.; CAI, M.; VAN
DONKELAAR, A.; MARTIN, R.V.; BURNETT, R.; AL-ALY, Z. Ambient fine particulate
matter air pollution and the risk of hospitalization among COVID-19 positive
individuals: Cohort study. Environment international, London, v. 154,
art. 106564, 2021. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106564.
EPA. Air data - Daily air quality tracker.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Available from:
https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/air-data-daily-air-quality-tracker.
Accessed on: 20 jul. 2022.
FIREBAUGH C.M.; BEESON, T.; MORGAN, S.;
WOJTYNA, A.; LASCANO H.; MADLEM, M. Mental distress associated with air quality
vulnerability during COVID-19. European Journal of Environment and Public
Health, London, v. 6, n. 1, art. em0103, 2022. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11674.
FIREBAUGH, C.M.; BEESON, T.; WOJTYNA, A.;
ARBOLEDA, R. Increased PM2. 5 levels associated with increased incidence of
COVID-19: The Washington wildfires of 2020. Environmental Smoke, João
Pessoa, v. 4, n. 2, p. 49-53, 2021. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.32435/envsmoke.20214249-53.
FIREBAUGH, C.M., BEESON, T.; WOJTYNA, A.;
BRAVO, L.; EVERSON, T.; JOHNSON, J.; SALDANA A. A community case study on
geographic, environmental, and social health disparities in COVID-19 disease:
Yakima, Washington. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, v. 10, n. 11,
p. 288-297, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2020.1011021.
INCIWEB. Schneider Springs, 2021.
Available from: https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/7775/. Accessed on: 21 May
2022.
MENDY, A.; WU, X.; KELLER, J.L.; FASSLER
C.S.; APEWORKIN, S.; MERSHA, T.B.; XIE, C.; PINNEY, S.M. Air pollution and the
pandemic: Long‐term PM2. 5 exposure and disease severity in COVID‐19 patients. Respirology,
Nedlands, v. 26, n. 12, p. 1181-1187, 2021. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14140.
NCEI (National Centers for Environmental
Information). 2021. Local climatological data -Yakima County. Available
from:
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/orders/IPS/IPS-D1A62DFC-6A40-41F5-9699-7822FD8E19BE.pdf.
Accessed on: 21 may 2022.
PAEZ-OSUNA, F.; VALENCIA-CASTENADA, G.;
REBOLLEDO, U. A. The link between COVID-19 mortality and PM2. 5 emissions in
rural and medium-size municipalities considering population density, dust
events, and wind speed. Chemosphere, Oxford, v. 286, art. 131634, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131634
TRAVIGLIO, M.; YU, Y.; POPOVIC, R.; SELLEY,
L.; LEAL, N.S.; MARTINS, L.M. Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in
England. Environmental pollution, Essex, v. 268, art. 115859, 2021.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115859.
WASHINGTON SMOKE INFORMATION. Smoky siege:
A look back at the smoke storm of 2020. 2020. Available from:
https://wasmoke.blogspot.com/2020/09/smoky-siege-look-back-at-smoke-storm-of.html.
Accessed on: 21 May 2022.
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. Yakima
Community Health Needs Assessment. 2017. Available on:
https://www.yakimamemorial.org/pdf/about/community-hna-2019.pdf. Accessed on:
21 May 2022.
WU, X., NETHERY, R.C.; SABATH, M.B.; BRAUN,
D.; DOMINICI, F. Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States:
Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis. Science
advances, Washington, v. 6, n. 45, art. eabd4049, 2020. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4049.
ZHOU, X.; JOSEY, K.; KAMMEREDINE, L.; CAINE,
M.C.; LIU, T.; MICKLEY, L.J.; COOPER, M.; DOMINICI, F. Excess of COVID-19 cases
and deaths due to fine particulate matter exposure during the 2020 wildfires in
the United States. Science advances, Washington, v. 7, n. 33, art.
eabi8789, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi8789.